What most preachers teach

The inherited Christian pulpit teaches the appointed feasts of Leviticus 23 as Jewish festivals — culturally specific to Yahudah (Judah), fulfilled by the Messiah (Christ), and therefore not binding on the body that follows him. The pulpit teaches the dietary commandments of Leviticus 11 and Deuteronomy 14 the same way — Jewish laws of cleanness, fulfilled-away by the Messiah (Christ), no longer binding on the post-resurrection believer. Both categories are sorted into the ceremonial law or the Mosaic law and declared retired. What replaces them in the inherited pulpit’s calendar are festivals dressed in Christian language but sourced upstream in Babylonian solar worship — Christmas at the December 25 winter-solstice celebration of Sol Invictus, Easter named after the fertility goddess Ishtar / Astarte / Eostre with rabbits and eggs as her symbols, Sunday as the sabbath replacement carried over from the Roman dies solis. The inherited reader is taught to call these festivals Christian and to call the Father’s appointed feasts Yahudi (Jewish).

Around this center, four secondary teachings cluster.

The verse most cited to retire the appointed feasts is Colossians 2:16–17 — let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days: which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Messiah (Christ). The pulpit reads shadow of things to come as no longer needed because the substance has come. The fact that the verse is Paul telling believers in Colossae not to let anyone judge them for keeping these things — i.e., the believers in Colossae were keeping them, and Paul was defending their right to do so against Gnostic asceticism — is reversed in the pulpit’s hands into Paul telling believers not to keep these things and to be free from the keeping. The actual argument the verse is making is inverted, and the inversion is then preached as the doctrine.

The verse most cited to retire the dietary commandments is Acts 10’s vision of Peter — the sheet let down from heaven with all manner of unclean animals, and the voice saying rise, Peter; kill, and eat. The pulpit reads this as Yahuah (God) declaring the dietary commandments null and void at the cross. The fact that Peter himself, in the same chapter, names the meaning of the vision as the inclusion of the people (the centurion Cornelius and his household) and not the inclusion of unclean food — Yahuah (God) hath shewed me that I should not call any man common or unclean (Acts 10:28) — does not surface as the meaning. Peter’s own interpretation is set aside in favor of the pulpit’s culinary reading.

The Sabbath is treated as fulfilled in the Messiah (Christ) and replaced by Sunday as the Lord’s day. The pulpit reads Hebrews 4:9–10 — there remaineth therefore a rest to the people of Yahuah (God). For he that is entered into his rest, he also hath ceased from his own works, as Yahuah (God) did from his — as the announcement that the saved enter a spiritual rest in the Messiah (Christ) that supersedes the seventh-day Sabbath the older covenant kept. The fact that the rest the verse names is the seventh-day rest Yahuah (God) himself entered at creation — the pattern the saved are now restored to, not retired from — is missed. Constantine’s Sunday Law of 321 AD and the Council of Laodicea’s anti-Sabbath canons of 363 AD are absent from the inherited reader’s awareness; the pulpit teaches Sunday as the day the early Christians chose without referencing the actual historical fingerprint of when and how the change was institutionalized.

The dietary commandments are dismissed with shorthand citations — Mark 7:19 (purging all meats in some translations), 1 Timothy 4:3–5 (every creature is good), Romans 14 (nothing is unclean of itself) — without examination of what each verse is actually addressing. Mark 7 is about ceremonial hand-washing tradition, not about clean and unclean animals. 1 Timothy 4 is naming food which Yahuah (God) hath created — i.e., the food categories Torah already names as clean. Romans 14 is addressing strong-and-weak fellowship over Yahudi (Jewish) tradition fences (sabbath-day-fasts, food sacrificed to idols), not over the Levitical clean/unclean distinctions. The pulpit’s shorthand citations are quoted; the contextual reading that refuses the pulpit’s conclusions is left aside.

This is what the inherited reader was handed about the feasts and the food. Jewish festivals fulfilled away. Jewish food laws fulfilled away. Sabbath replaced by Sunday. Christmas, Easter, Sunday as orthodox inheritance. The Father’s calendar quietly retired and a different calendar substituted, with biblical-sounding language used to authorize the substitution.


Where the inherited reading falls short

The reading collapses against scripture’s own naming of the feasts and the food, against the prophets’ continued reference to both, against the Messiah’s (Christ’s) own keeping of both, against the actual contextual readings of the verses cited to retire them, and against the cumulative witness that the pulpit’s substitution festivals are sourced upstream in Babylonian solar worship.

Scripture names the appointed feasts as the feasts of Yahuah (God), not the feasts of the Yahudim (Jews). Speak unto the children of Yashar’el (Israel), and say unto them, Concerning the feasts of Yahuah (God), which ye shall proclaim to be holy convocations, even these are my feasts (Leviticus 23:2). The appointed feasts are the Father’s own. He named them. He sanctified them. He called them my feasts. They were given to Yashar’el (Israel) because Yashar’el (Israel) was the covenant people the Father gathered to himself — but they belong to him, not to the people he gave them to. The pulpit’s relabeling of the feasts of Yahuah (God) as the feasts of the Yahudim (Jews) is a relabeling Yahuah (God) himself foreclosed in the verse that gives them.

The dietary commandments are framed as the Father’s own setting-apart instruction, not as ceremonial law. I am Yahuah (God) your Elohim (God): ye shall therefore sanctify yourselves, and ye shall be holy; for I am holy (Leviticus 11:44). The dietary commandments of Leviticus 11 and Deuteronomy 14 are part of how the covenant people are set apart from the world. They are not health rules — though they often are healthy. They are sanctification rules. Sanctify themselves is the verb Yahuah (God) uses for his people setting themselves apart by these commandments. The pulpit’s flattening of the dietary commandments into Jewish food laws fulfilled away erases the sanctification logic the Father himself stated.

The prophets continue to reference both the feasts and the food in scripture’s vision of the kingdom yet to come. And it shall come to pass, that from one new moon to another, and from one sabbath to another, shall all flesh come to worship before me, saith Yahuah (God) (Isaiah 66:23). All flesh — not just Yahudah (Judah), not just Jewish believers — keeping new moons and sabbaths in the world to come. And it shall come to pass, that every one that is left of all the nations which came against Jerusalem shall even go up from year to year to worship the King, Yahuah (God) of hosts, and to keep the feast of tabernacles (Zechariah 14:16). The Feast of Tabernacles in the millennial reign — kept by the nations the harvest left alive, going up year to year. The Father’s calendar is not retiring; it is the calendar of the kingdom being established. They shall not eat the bread of Yahuah (God)… and have made no difference between the holy and profane, neither have they shewed difference between the unclean and the clean (Ezekiel 22:26). The clean/unclean distinction continues into the prophetic vision.

Yahusha (Jesus) kept the appointed feasts and lived under the dietary commandments. He kept Passover (Luke 22:7–15, the last supper as the Passover meal). He kept the Feast of Tabernacles (John 7:2, 14, now about the midst of the feast Yahusha (Jesus) went up into the temple, and taught). He kept the Feast of Dedication (John 10:22, and it was at Jerusalem the feast of the dedication, and it was winter). He kept the Sabbath. He honored the dietary commandments. Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled (Matthew 5:17–18). The walk of the Son of Yahuah (God) is the irrefutable answer to every system that calls Torah-life bondage. He walked it without compromise.

The verses cited to retire the feasts and the food do not say what the pulpit reads them as saying. Colossians 2:16–17 is Paul defending the Colossian believers’ right to keep the feasts and the food against the Gnostic ascetic teaching that judged them for keeping these things. Let no man therefore judge you — meaning do not let the false teachers judge you for keeping these. The believers were keeping. Paul was defending. The pulpit’s reversal of the argument is a reading scripture refuses. Which are a shadow of things to come — the things to come are the things the prophets named as coming. The shadow points forward to the substance the millennial reign will bring. The shadow is not erased; it points the way to where it is going.

Acts 10’s vision is interpreted by Peter himself in the same chapter. Yahuah (God) hath shewed me that I should not call any man common or unclean (Acts 10:28). The vision is about people, not food. Peter says so. The pulpit’s culinary reading has set aside Peter’s own interpretation in favor of an interpretation the chapter itself does not endorse. Mark 7’s question about ceremonial hand-washing is about ceremonial hand-washing, not about clean and unclean meats — now when they saw some of his disciples eat bread with defiled, that is to say, with unwashen, hands, they found fault (Mark 7:2). The dispute is about whether the disciples’ hands have been ceremonially washed before they eat. The conclusion purging all meats in the parenthetical of some translations is a translator’s gloss, not a textual fact, and even if it were textual, it would mean that food passing through the digestive system does not defile in the way the Pharisaic tradition claimed. 1 Timothy 4:3–5 names food which Yahuah (God) hath created — the food categories Torah already calls clean. Romans 14 is about strong-and-weak fellowship over Yahudi (Jewish) tradition fences, not about Levitical clean/unclean.

The substitution festivals are sourced upstream in Babylonian solar worship. December 25 was the Roman Dies Natalis Solis Invicti — the birthday of the unconquered sun — celebrated by Mithras worshippers and adopted by Constantine as the Christian observance. The Easter complex carries the name of the fertility goddess Ishtar / Astarte / Eostre, with the rabbit (a fertility symbol of the goddess) and the egg (a fertility symbol of the goddess) preserved as the season’s iconography. Sunday as the day of worship was the Roman dies solis — the day of the sun — institutionalized as the Christian sabbath substitute by Constantine’s Sunday Law of 321 AD and codified by the Council of Laodicea’s anti-Sabbath canons of 363 AD. The historical fingerprint is documented in the source material the pulpit does not surface for the inherited reader. And he shall… think to change times and laws (Daniel 7:25). The horn moved what could be moved. The substitutions wear Christian language while running on Babylonian content underneath.


How the framework reads the same scripture faithfully

The framework reads the appointed feasts and the dietary commandments as scripture wrote them — the Father’s own, given to his covenant people, kept across every age the prophets named, kept by Yahusha (Jesus) himself, carried forward by the early body, and continuing into the kingdom of priests on the earth in the millennial reign. The Father hallowed these things in the beginning. He never unhallowed them.

The appointed feasts are the Father’s own. Concerning the feasts of Yahuah (God), which ye shall proclaim to be holy convocations, even these are my feasts (Leviticus 23:2). Passover, the Feast of Unleavened Bread, Firstfruits, the Feast of Weeks, the Feast of Trumpets, the Day of Atonement, the Feast of Tabernacles. They are not Yahudi (Jewish) in origin; they are the Father’s, given to his people, kept across every age. Yahusha (Jesus) kept them. Paul kept them. The early body kept them. The horn of Daniel 7:25 thought to change them — renamed them pagan, replaced them with Babylonian solar festivals dressed in nativity scenes and pastel rabbits, and called the substitution Christian. He thought to change. He did not. The Father’s calendar stands.

The food categories Yahuah (God) called holy stand on the same footing. I am Yahuah (God) your Elohim (God): ye shall therefore sanctify yourselves, and ye shall be holy; for I am holy (Leviticus 11:44). The dietary commandments of Leviticus 11 and Deuteronomy 14 are part of how the covenant people are set apart from the world. They are not health rules — though they often are healthy. They are sanctification rules. What the Father called clean and unclean stays what he called.

What Yahuah (God) hallowed in the beginning he never unhallowed. Hallowing is not a human transaction; no council can vote it down, no scholar can argue it away. The Father’s set-apart things remain set apart even when men forget them. Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away (Matthew 24:35). The pulpit’s claim that the cross retired the things Yahuah (God) hallowed is a claim scripture does not make. The cross opened the door home for the scattered seed. It did not erase the calendar of the kingdom they were coming home to.

The Sabbath is the day Yahuah (God) hallowed in the beginning. And on the seventh day Elohim (God) ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made. And Elohim (God) blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: because that in it he had rested from all his work which Elohim (God) created and made (Genesis 2:2–3). The seventh day was sanctified at creation, before any covenant was named with any people. It is the Father’s day, hallowed before there was a Yashar’el (Israel) or a Yahudah (Judah) to receive it. The fourth commandment names the day at Sinai for the people gathered there. The horn moved the day at the fourth-century councils. The Father’s day stands.

The new heart is the Spirit-empowered keeping of these things, not their abolition. I will put my spirit within you, and cause you to walk in my statutes, and ye shall keep my judgments, and do them (Ezekiel 36:27). The Spirit causes the walking in my statutes. The statutes include the appointed feasts, the food, the Sabbath, and the rest of what Yahuah (God) gave. The new heart of Jeremiah 31:33 is the same Torah, internalized — I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts. Not Torah replaced. Not Torah abolished. The same Torah, in a new place. The feasts and the food are not external rules imposed on a reluctant heart; they are written into a heart that loves what the Father loves.

The kingdom-to-come keeps these things. And it shall come to pass, that from one new moon to another, and from one sabbath to another, shall all flesh come to worship before me, saith Yahuah (God) (Isaiah 66:23). All flesh — not just Yahudah (Judah), not just Jewish believers — keeping new moons and sabbaths in the world to come. And it shall come to pass, that every one that is left of all the nations which came against Jerusalem shall even go up from year to year to worship the King, Yahuah (God) of hosts, and to keep the feast of tabernacles (Zechariah 14:16). The Feast of Tabernacles in the millennial reign — kept by the nations the harvest left alive, going up year to year. The Father’s calendar is not retiring. It is the calendar of the kingdom we are coming home to.

This document names what we hold; it does not tell the reader what to do. The Free Truth Principle governs every layer of this work — including this one. The framework names the Father’s calendar as standing. It does not hand the reader a calendar with action items for this Friday or this feast. The Ruach HaKodesh (Holy Spirit) is not in a hurry. The Father gathers his own and walks them into his ways at his pace. Some readers will arrive at this document already keeping these things; others will arrive having never heard of them; others will arrive contesting them. To each, the framework says the same thing scripture says: the Father’s calendar stands. What the reader does next is between the reader and the Father.

The pulpit’s substitution festivals are sourced upstream in Babylonian solar worship. December 25, Easter, Sunday — each carries upstream content the inherited reader was not shown. Take heed to thyself that thou be not snared by following them, after that they be destroyed from before thee; and that thou enquire not after their gods, saying, How did these nations serve their gods? even so will I do likewise. Thou shalt not do so unto Yahuah (God) thy Elohim (God): for every abomination to Yahuah (God), which he hateth, have they done unto their gods (Deuteronomy 12:30–31). The framework names the substitution. The framework does not chase the reader off Sunday this week. The framework lays the witness down and lets the reader walk the road with the Father.

The inherited pulpit retired the Father’s calendar and substituted a different one, calling the substitution Christian. The framework restores what scripture has been carrying. The feasts of Yahuah (God) are still the Father’s own. The food the Father called clean is still set apart. The Sabbath he hallowed in the beginning he never unhallowed. The kingdom we are coming home to keeps these things. The framework speaks the witness. The reader walks the road.


Layer 3 expansion complete. The doorway opens to the long form’s §V (The New Heart), §VI (The Sign of the Covenant), §VII (The Commands), and §XX (Eschatology) for the deeper treatment of the Spirit-empowered walk and the calendar of the kingdom yet to come.

A deeper dive — the blog post


← §XVII. The Sacred Names
↑ Statement of Faith
§XIX. The Extra-Canonical Witnesses →

Skip to toolbar