There is a verse in the apostle’s first letter that ought to settle every theological argument in the inherited Christian tradition before the argument starts. It does not, because the inherited tradition mostly walks past the verse. The verse is short, plain, and unambiguous. It supplies the standard scripture itself uses to test every claim.

And hereby we do know that we know him, if we keep his commandments. He that saith, I know him, and keepeth not his commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him.1 John 2:3–4

The framework calls this verse the 1234 of Truth — first John, chapter two, verses three and four. Not because it is a magic spell. Because it is the standing test the Word itself supplies for every interpretation, every doctrine, and every system. The verse sits there. It has been sitting there since the apostle wrote it. The pulpit that has built whole theological architectures requiring this verse to be set aside has built on a foundation the apostle himself disqualified.

This essay walks the standard. Why scripture itself supplies a filter. How the filter works. What the filter exposes when applied to the antinomian gospel and to the flesh-performance gospel both. And why the framework asks the reader to apply the filter to this very document.

The Word supplies its own test

The apostle did not write a vague suggestion. He wrote a binary. He that saith, I know him, and keepeth not his commandments, is a liar. Two categories. Either the one claiming to know him keeps his commandments — and the truth is in him — or he does not, and the truth is not in him. The apostle does not leave a third option. The Spirit who inspired the apostle does not leave a third option. The verse is what it is.

This is not the framework’s invention. We did not assemble the test. The Word itself provides it. If a reading of any scripture requires this verse to be false, the reading is false. If a system of doctrine requires this verse to be set aside, the system is wrong. There is no exception. Yahuah (God) does not lie.

The advantage of this kind of test is that it does not depend on the framework being right about every other interpretation. The reader who applies the 1234 of Truth to this document, to this framework, to every sentence we have written, is doing exactly what the apostle asked him to do. The standard is the Word’s, not ours. We are not asking the reader to take our word for anything. We are handing him the test the Word itself supplies and asking him to apply it.

What 1 John 2:3–4 actually says

Read the verse slowly. Hereby — by this — we do know that we know him. The knowing is verifiable. There is a way to know whether the claim of knowing is true or false. The apostle is naming the test.

If we keep his commandments. The keeping is the test. Not the believing alone. Not the confessing alone. Not the praying-the-prayer alone. Keeping the commandments. The test is behavioral, not just verbal. The reality of the relationship is verified by the conformity of the life to the commandments of the one we claim to know.

He that saith, I know him, and keepeth not his commandments, is a liar. The verse names the lie plainly. Profession without obedience is liar. Not misguided. Not immature. Not still growing. Liar. The apostle is uncompromising. The Spirit who inspired the apostle is uncompromising.

And the truth is not in him. The full verdict. The truth is not in the one whose claim of knowing is unsupported by his keeping. Not in. The truth is somewhere else. It has not landed in him.

The apostle goes on. But whoso keepeth his word, in him verily is the love of Yahuah (God) perfected: hereby know we that we are in him (1 John 2:5). The keeping is the seal. The keeping perfects the love. The keeping is the hereby by which the saved know they are in him. The whole letter is anchored on this test.

Apply the filter to the antinomian gospel

The antinomian gospel — the gospel that retired the commandments and recast Torah-life as bondage — fails the test on contact.

The antinomian claim, in its plainest form: we know him by faith alone, no commandment-keeping required. The cross abolished the commandments. The believer is no longer under the obligation of the law. To insist on commandment-keeping is to fall from grace.

Apply 1 John 2:3–4 to that claim. The verse refuses the reading. He that saith, I know him, and keepeth not his commandments, is a liar. The antinomian gospel says we can know him without keeping his commandments. The verse says we cannot. The reading does not survive contact with the test.

This is not a small contradiction. This is not a peripheral verse the antinomian system can quietly route around. This is a binary disqualification of the system itself. Either 1 John 2:3–4 is false, or the antinomian gospel is false. They cannot both stand. Yahuah (God) does not lie. The verse stands. The gospel that requires the verse to be set aside falls.

The pulpit has handled this contradiction in different ways. Some pulpits redefine commandments in 1 John as something other than the commandments of the Father — just love your neighbor, or the commandments are now love, or the commandments John means are not the Old Testament commandments. All of these readings collapse against the apostle’s broader letter. And this is his commandment, That we should believe on the name of his Son Yahusha (Jesus) Messiah (Christ), and love one another, as he gave us commandment. And he that keepeth his commandments dwelleth in him, and he in him (1 John 3:23–24). And hereby we know that he abideth in us, by the Spirit which he hath given us. The commandments include the commandments of the Father carried forward by the Messiah (Christ). Loving the brethren is one of them. So is everything else the Father gave. The narrowing the antinomian system attempts on the word commandments does not match the apostle’s actual usage.

Other pulpits acknowledge the contradiction and treat 1 John 2:3–4 as a kind of edge case — the apostle’s high standard for real believers, but not the load-bearing test for every believer. This treatment is also wrong. The apostle did not write a high standard for spiritual elites. He wrote the test for every claim of knowing. The verse is the test. There is no edge case.

Apply the filter to the flesh-performance gospel

The 1234 of Truth refuses the antinomian gospel. It also refuses the flesh-performance gospel — the system that says we know him by Torah-keeping in our own strength, justified by the works of the law, earning standing by performance.

The flesh-performance claim: we know him because we keep all the commandments. The keeping is the credential. The keeping is what brings us in.

The 1234 of Truth refuses this reading too, and it does so in the same chapter. Whereby we do know that we know him, the verse says. We do know. The knowing is presupposed. The keeping is the evidence of the knowing, not the credential that produces the knowing. The apostle does not say we know him by keeping his commandments. He says we know that we know him by keeping his commandments. The order matters. The relationship is first. The keeping is the seal of the relationship that already is.

This protects the framework from the false-inclusion gospel that the Hebrew Roots tradition has carried (see §XI). The keeping is real. The commandments are real. The love that keeps them is real. None of the keeping makes anyone the seed of promise the prophets named. The keeping is the evidence of belonging to the Shepherd whose voice the sheep hear. The keeping is not the credential by which a non-sheep becomes a sheep.

The full balance is the framework’s: faith brings the saved in (justification, by promise, by the atoning work of the Messiah (Christ), by grace alone). Love walks the way home (sanctification, by Spirit-empowered Torah-keeping, by the new heart, by the commandments the Father gave). The two are not in tension. They are one motion of one love. The 1234 of Truth tests the whole picture and disqualifies any reading that collapses one half into the other.

Apply the filter to this Statement of Faith

This is the part the awakening reader needs to hear plainly. Apply the 1234 of Truth to this very framework. Test what we have written by the same standard we are using to test everything else. Does anything in this Statement of Faith require 1 John 2:3–4 to be false? Does anything we have argued require the apostle’s verse to be set aside?

If you find a sentence that does, set this document aside. The standard is the Word, not us. We are not appointing ourselves above the test. We are subjecting ourselves to it the same way we are subjecting the antinomian gospel and the flesh-performance gospel to it. The framework is one more reading. The Word is the standard the readings are tested against.

We believe the framework passes the test. We have drafted every section against the Red Lines, against the cumulative witness of Torah, prophets, and apostles, and against this very verse. Faith brings us in. Love walks the way home. That summary survives 1 John 2:3–4 because it holds the relationship first and the keeping as the seal of the relationship. The new heart loves the commandments and walks in them. That picture survives the test because the new heart is the Father’s gift, given to those he has gathered, and the keeping that follows is the natural motion of the heart he has given.

But test it. Do not take our word. The standard is the Word, not us. Prove all things; hold fast that which is good (1 Thessalonians 5:21).

The new heart agrees

There is one more verse that lands the picture and explains why the keeping is not a burden once the test is passed.

For this is the love of Yahuah (God), that we keep his commandments: and his commandments are not grievous.1 John 5:3

The same apostle. The same letter. The same standard. His commandments are not grievous. They are not heavy. They are not a yoke. They are the form love takes. I delight in the law of Yahuah (God) after the inward man (Romans 7:22) — Paul said the same thing. The new heart finds the commandments the natural motion of the love that has been given to it.

The pulpit that has called the commandments grievous has called the new heart’s joy grievous. The new heart laughs at the description. The 1234 of Truth assumes the new heart. The keeping is the seal of the heart that has been changed. The grievous-ness the antinomian pulpit named was the projection of an unregenerate heart onto the commandments — a heart that did not love what the Father loved and therefore experienced the Father’s instruction as burden. The new heart does not. The new heart finds the commandments easy because the new heart is the kind of heart the commandments fit.

Why scripture asks for the test at all

The reader might wonder why the apostle would supply a test like this in the first place. Why does the saved need to know whether his knowing is real? Is this not just the kind of self-doubt the inherited pulpit warned against?

The apostle is not producing self-doubt. He is producing self-knowledge. The reader who applies the test to himself — am I keeping his commandments? — and finds the answer to be yes, by his grace, in his Spirit, with imperfection but with real motion knows that the relationship he has been given is real. The reader who applies the test and finds the answer to be no, I have been claiming to know him while my life shows no conformity to his commandments receives the warning the apostle wrote the verse to deliver. The warning is mercy, not cruelty. The reader still has time to put down the false claim and pick up the real walk. Now is the day of salvation (2 Corinthians 6:2). The verse is the apostle’s gift to the saved and the warning to the self-deceived.

This is also why the verse is a test against systems, not just against individuals. The pulpit that produces antinomian believers — believers who claim to know the Father while teaching that the Father’s commandments are abolished — fails the test as a system. The pulpit that produces flesh-performers — believers who claim to keep the Father’s commandments while having no relationship with the Messiah (Christ) — fails the test as a system. The 1234 of Truth sorts the systems the same way it sorts the individual claims. The test is uncompromising, by the apostle’s own design.

What we ask

Pick up the test. Apply it to whatever religious claim is set in front of you next — by anyone, in any room, with any vocabulary. Apply it to the books you read. Apply it to the sermons you hear. Apply it to this Statement of Faith. The standard is the Word’s. The verse is plain.

He that saith, I know him, and keepeth not his commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him.1 John 2:4

If a system of doctrine requires this verse to be false, the system is false. The Father does not lie. The verse stands.

If you find that the framework we have laid out passes the test, walk with it. Test every section. Hold fast that which is good. If you find that another framework you have been holding fails the test, you have time to put it down. The Father is not in a hurry. The Spirit walks his own at his own pace. The test is in your hand. Use it.

And this is the love of Yahuah (God), that we keep his commandments: and his commandments are not grievous.1 John 5:3

The keeping is the joy. The new heart is the equipment. The Father is the one who gives both. Walk the road with him.


A deeper dive — if the work has fed you


← Back to all posts  ·  Statement of Faith

Skip to toolbar